The dataset of bat (Chiroptera, Mammalia) occurrences in Ukraine collected by the Ukrainian Bat Rehabilitation Center (2011-2022)

データ レコード

この オカレンス（観察データと標本) リソース内のデータは、1 つまたは複数のデータ テーブルとして生物多様性データを共有するための標準化された形式であるダーウィン コア アーカイブ (DwC-A) として公開されています。 コア データ テーブルには、20,950 レコードが含まれています。

この IPT はデータをアーカイブし、データ リポジトリとして機能します。データとリソースのメタデータは、 ダウンロード セクションからダウンロードできます。 バージョン テーブルから公開可能な他のバージョンを閲覧でき、リソースに加えられた変更を知ることができます。

バージョン

次の表は、公にアクセス可能な公開バージョンのリソースのみ表示しています。

引用方法

研究者はこの研究内容を以下のように引用する必要があります。:

Prylutska A, Yerofeieva M, Bohodist V, Shulenko A, But A, Kravchenko K, Prylutskyi O, Vlaschenko A (2022): The dataset of bat (Chiroptera, Mammalia) occurrences in Ukraine collected by the Ukrainian Bat Rehabilitation Center (2011-2022). v1.4. Ukrainian Bat Rehabilitation Center. Dataset/Occurrence. https://ukraine.ipt.gbif.no/resource?r=occurrences_of_bats_in_ukraine&v=1.4

権利

研究者は権利に関する下記ステートメントを尊重する必要があります。:

パブリッシャーとライセンス保持者権利者は Ukrainian Bat Rehabilitation Center。 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY 4.0) License.

GBIF登録

このリソースをはGBIF と登録されており GBIF UUID: af0a7284-a634-4082-8c14-ab1f7030775bが割り当てられています。   Participant Node Managers Committee によって承認されたデータ パブリッシャーとして GBIF に登録されているUkrainian Bat Rehabilitation Center が、このリソースをパブリッシュしました。

キーワード

Chiroptera; urban-landscapes; occurrence; Ukraine.; Observation; Chiroptera; urban-landscapes; occurrence; Ukraine.

連絡先

地理的範囲

Ukraine, all the territory

生物分類学的範囲

Taxonomic coverage of the dataset consists of the Mammals from the order Chiroptera. All except one recorded bat belong to the family Vespertilionidae, one individual belongs to the family Molossidae (see Prylutska et al. 2020). In total, 12 species and 1 subspecies were recorded by direct records, 11 species from Vespertilionidae belonging to 7 genera. By correspondence records, 13 species from the family Vespertilionidae were recorded belonging to 8 genera. For most of the bat species presented in the database, there were no nomenclatural changes or developments for the last 10 years, and their taxonomic status is definite (Dietz and Kiefer 2014). The exception is Pipistrellus kuhlii (Kuhl, 1817), presented in Europe by two taxons well-distinguishable visually - Pipistrellus kuhlii kuhlii (Kuhl, 1817) and Pipistrellus kuhlii lepidus (Blyth, 1845) (Andriollo et al. 2015, Sachanowicz et al. 2017). However, there was not a clear view of the systematic status of these two taxons, do they just morphs or true subspecies (Sachanowicz et al. 2017). For the whole of the Ukrainian territory only P. k. lepidus was distinguished till now (Sachanowicz et al. 2017, Hukov et al. 2020). However, there was noted species range expansion for P. k. kuhlii from west to east, and it was hypothesized that it would appear in most western regions of Ukraine soon (Sachanowicz et al. 2017). All the bats identified previously (by UBRC specialists) as P. kuhlii were later reevaluated as P. k. lepidus. Yet we cannot absolutely confirm whether P. kuhlii from the western part of Ukraine ( identified by photos), actually was P. k. lepidus and not a P. k. kuhlii. For this reason, we categorized correspondence records to a higher-level species taxon P. kuhlii, but direct records were marked as P. k. lepidus.

時間的範囲

プロジェクトデータ

In collaboration with the Finnish Biodiversity Information Facility (FinBIF) and Pensoft Publishers, GBIF has announced a new call for authors to submit and publish data papers on Northern Eurasia in a special collection of Biodiversity Data Journal (BDJ).

プロジェクトに携わる要員:

Dmitry Schigel

• 連絡先

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2919-1168

収集方法

The records of bats for this dataset were done by ordinary people or by specialists of UBRS during bat rescue operations in human settlements. Most of the records represent accidental findings of bats (on the ground or inside the flats/offices). Another smaller part of the records describes the bat hibernation colonies found in buildings during the renovation or window replacement works (Hukov et al. 2020, Kravchenko et al. 2017). The information about bat findings was transferred by citizens to the UBRC through the phone helpline and social media messengers. The UBRC facilities are based in Kharkiv city (NE Ukraine), and all found bats were transported to the UBRC’s office for detailed examination and recording. When a bat was not delivered to the UBRC’s office, its species and sex (if possible) were determined from a picture taken for record (see Prylutska and Vlaschenko 2013). For the current dataset we summarized two types of records: (i) direct (or factual) records consisting of bats that were delivered to the UBRC’s office and examined by specialists (“occurrences” in basiOfRecord term in the dataset); (ii) correspondence records, bats that were identified by picture(s) (“human observations” in basiOfRecord term). During the warm period of the year bats were released back to the wild. In the cold period of the year bats were staying at the UBRC facilities till spring (under suitable for hibernation conditions). Individuals with signs of injuries were examined by a veterinarian and received proper treatment. Bats that were not capable of flying after the treatment, were left at the UBRC for life-long care and rehabilitation. Additionally, protocols for bat care, ringing and releasing to nature have been already published (Domanska et al. 2017, Vlaschenko et al. 2020). Bat species were identified by UBRC workers and specialists using illustrated keys (Dietz and Helversen 2004, Dietz and Kiefer 2014). The methods for identification of bat age, sex and measurements has been already published in detail by members of the UBRC (Hukov et al. 2020, Kravchenko et al. 2017, Prylutska et al. 2021). Specifically, we use three age categories: for the description of bat age (i) juvenile - recently born not flying individuals, (ii) this-year-born individuals (subadult) - usually from the age of 1 till 10-11 months and (iii) adult individuals (Kravchenko et al. 2017). Females of bats with protuberant nipples (1 mm or more in diameter) and milk-white, abraded canine teeth were ranked as adults. Females with flat and pink nipples and pinkish, sharp canine teeth were ranked as first-year individuals (Kravchenko et al. 2017, Prylutska et al. 2021). Males with milky-white and worn canine teeth, big testes (from 7 × 4 mm or more), and distended, filled epididymis were ranked as adults. Males with pinkish and sharp canine teeth, small testes, and small, undescended epididymis were ranked as first year individuals (Kravchenko et al. 2017, Prylutska et al. 2021). Location of each found bat were recorded as exact address (oblast, city, address) and later was geocoded manually, using Google Maps service. For each record coordinate uncertainty is mentioned (in meters). Records for which only settlements were known, georeferenced as geometric centroid of the polygon of the settlement, with coordinate precision calculated as radius of the polygon. We identified it as the radius for each settlement using the official administrative boundary shapefile (https://data.humdata.org/dataset/cod-ab-ukr?), calculation of the square for each settlement and centroids in the QGIS software (QGIS Development Team, 2009. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation. URL http://qgis.org).

Method step description:

1. For bats transferred to the UBRC (Occurrence): Identification of bat species, sex and age, measuring body mass and forearm length, ringing the bats with bat rings. Completing google sheets with all bat details and measurements, date and place of the record.
2. For bats found in other cities (Human observation): Identification of bat species by photos or videos. Completing google sheets with all details about bat (species, sex), date and place of the record.
3. Aggregating occurrence records and human observation records.
4. Manual georeferencing of records based on descriptions of the localities using Google Maps;
5. Data post-processing using Darwin Core terms (Wieczorek et al. 2012);
6. Data cleaning using OpenRefine (OpenRefine 2022).

書誌情報の引用

1. Andriollo T, Naciri Y, Ruedi M (2015) Two mitochondrial barcodes for one biological species: the case of European Kuhl’s pipistrelles (Chiroptera). PLoS ONE, 10 (8), e0134881. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134881
2. Dietz C, Helversen O.von (2004) Illustrated identification key to the bats of Europe. Electronic Publication, Version 1.0. released 15.12.2004, Tuebingen & Erlangen (Germany).
3. Dietz C, Kiefer A (2014) The Bats of Europe. Know, Identify, Protect [Die Fledermäuse Europas. Kennen, Bestimmen, Schützen] Kosmos Verlag, Stuttgart, 400 pp. [in German]. [ISBN 978-3-440-11560-2]
4. Domanska A, Prylutska A, Vlaschenko A, Holovchenko O, Kovalov V, Orlenko A (2017) Bat treatment experience in Bat Rehabilitation Center of Feldman Ecopark in 2017 year. XXVI Ogólnopolska Konferencja Chiropterologiczna, Wiezyca, Poland 17-19 November 2017. Wiezyca, 44 pp.
5. Hukov V, Timofieieva O, Prylutska A, Rodenko O, Moiseienko M, Bohodist V, Domanska A, Vlaschenko A (2020) Wintering of an urban bat (Pipistrellus kuhlii lepidus) in recently occupied areas. European Journal of Ecology, 6, 102–120 pp. https://doi.org/10.17161/eurojecol.v6i1.13629
6. Hukov V, Prylutska A, Timofieieva O, Rodenko O, Moiseienko M, Bohodist V, Domanska A, Kravchenko K, Vlaschenko A (2020). Winter colonies of Kuhl's bat (Pipistrellus kuhlii subsp. lepidus Blyth, 1845) in Ukraine, 2013-2020. Version 1.5. Ukrainian Bat Rehabilitation Center. Occurrence https://doi.org/10.15468/3dljm6
7. Kravchenko K, Vlaschenko A, Prylutska A, Rodenko O, Hukov V, Shuvaev V (2017) Year-round monitoring of bat records in an urban area: Kharkiv (NE Ukraine), 2013, as a case study. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 41 (3), 530–548 pp. https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1602-51
8. OpenRefine (2022) OpenRefine: A free, open source, powerful tool for working with messy data. 3.5.2. Release date: 2022-1-26. https://openrefine.org/
9. Prylutska A, Vlaschenko A (2013) Material to the bat distribution on the base of results of contact-center in Kharkov (2008-2013). [Материалы по распространению рукокрылых по итогам работы контакт-центра в Харькове (2008-2013 гг.)]. Biological systems, Chernovtsy, 5 (4): 532–537 pp. [in Russian].
10. Prylutska A, Moiseienko M, Yerofeieva M, Hukov V, Vlaschenko A (2020) Northern record for Tadarida teniotis (NE Ukraine) far from known species range. Bat Research & Conservation, 13 (1): 104–108 pp. https://doi.org/10.15407/zoo2020.01.053
11. Prylutska A, Vlaschenko A, Domanska A, Hukov V (2021) Guide to the rehabilitation of bats. [Посібник з реабілітації кажанів]. Cyphraprint, Kharkiv, 126 pp. [in Ukrainian]. [ISBN 978-617-7565-60-3] https://batsukraine.org/library-ua
12. QGIS Development Team, 2009. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation. http://qgis.org
13. Sachanowicz K, Piskorski M, Tereba A (2017) Systematics and taxonomy of Pipistrellus kuhlii (Kuhl,1817) in Central Europe and the Balkans. Zootaxa, 4306 (1), 053–066 pp.
14. Schober W, Grimmberger E (1998) The bats of Europe: Know - Identify - Protect. Kosmos Nature Guide. [Die Fledermäuse Europas: Kennen – Bestimmen – Schützen. Kosmos Naturführer]. Franckh'Sche, Verlagshandlung 2nd ed. and enlarged, 265 pp. [in Germany].
15. Vlaschenko A, Prylutska A, Kravchenko K, Rodenko O, Hukov V, Timofieieva O, Holovchenko O, Moiseienko M, Kovalov V (2020) Regional recapture of bats (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) ringed in Eastern Ukraine. Zoodiversity, 54(1): 53-66 pp. https://doi.org/10.15407/zoo2020.01.053

追加のメタデータ